Adamawa State Governor, Admiral Murtala Nyako (retd.)
THE
impeached Governor of Adamawa State, Murtala Nyako, moments after the
state lawmakers pushed him out of power, said he had accepted his fate
but asked his traducers to be mindful of God’s judgment.
“Praise be to Allah, we accept what has
happened. This is the judgment of man; we should all remember that there
is God’s judgment in the hereafter,”Nyako said through his Director of
Press and Public Affairs, Ahmad Sajoh.
Sajoh told The PUNCH that his principal had accepted his fate.
Members of the Adamawa State House of
Assembly on Tuesday impeached the former governor after adopting the
report of the seven-member panel that investigated allegations of gross
misconduct against Nyako.
Both the governor and his deputy, Bala
Ngilari, had been investigated but the deputy governor sent his
resignation letter to the state House of Assembly few hours before the
lawmakers voted out Nyako.
Speaker of the state assembly, Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, was on Tuesday sworn in as acting governor.
Fintiri’s swearing-in rubbished earlier
speculations that the Peoples Democratic Party wanted to stop the
Speaker from becoming the acting governor.
A source, who gave this indication on
Tuesday, explained, “You know the deputy governor’s resignation is a
nullity by virtue of the fact that it was procedurally wrong. The
constitution stipulates that his resignation letter should be submitted
to the governor and not the House of Assembly.
“The PDP in Abuja wants to swear in the
deputy governor as acting governor but the Speaker, who hails from the
same constituency as the deputy governor, shelved him out to pave the
way for himself.
“It is even curious that the Speaker,
who is desirous of being a direct beneficiary of the whole thing, was
the one who personally presided over the impeachment.”
Nyako had also said on Tuesday that his
deputy’s resignation remained a nullity because it did not follow
constitutional procedure.
The ex-governor’s spokesman, in a
statement, said, “We wish to state categorically that Section 306 (5) of
the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as Amended
requires that the deputy governor resigns not to the House of Assembly
but to the governor.
“As of the time the supposed resignation
was said to have been tendered in the House, Murtala Nyako was the
Governor of Adamawa State.
“No such letter was written to him, none
was received by him and none was approved by him. It should therefore
be known that in the eyes of the Law, the deputy governor has not
resigned. Bala James Ngillari is still the Deputy Governor of Adamawa
State.
“This clarification is necessary to
avert another subversion of the Constitution since the other processes
relating to the impeachment saga have all been in contravention of the
Constitution and the Law.”
The statement cautioned that the
continued abuse of the constitution and the laws of the land might spell
doom for Nigeria’s democracy.
Governor’s removal
Nyako’s removal followed the adoption of
the report of a seven-man panel earlier constituted by the former
acting Chief Judge of the state, Justice Ambrose Mammadi, to investigate
allegations of gross misconduct levelled against the governor and his
deputy by the Peoples Democratic Party-led legislature.
The former governor has been a member of
the All Progressives Congress since he defected from the PDP late 2013
alongside other ex-PDP governors Rotimi Amaechi, Rivers State; Musa
Kwankwaso, Kano; Abdulfattah Ahmed, Kwara; and Magatakarda Wamakko,
Sokoto.
On Tuesday, 18 out of the 25 members of the Adamawa State House of Assembly endorsed the governor’s impeachment.
The investigative panel, which was
headed by a retired judicial officer, Buba Kajama, found Nyako guilty of
16 out of the 20 allegations levelled against him.
Fintiri, who presided over the session,
drew the attention of the members to Section 188 sub-section 9 of the
country’s 1999 constitution, which stipulates that the House should
consider the report of a panel by two-thirds majority and that if the
House adopts the report, the governor or his deputy shall stand removed
from office.
The Speaker said, “Based on the adoption
of the panel report Governor Murtala Nyako of Adamawa State shall stand
removed from office.”
The member representing Gombi, Jerry
Kundisi, moved the motion for the adoption of the report. He was
seconded by the Deputy Speaker, Kwamoti Laori.
Kundisi quoted section 191, sub-section 2
of the constitution, which states that “if a governor is removed from
office and office of the Deputy Governor is vacant, the Speaker of the
House of the Assembly shall be sworn in as an acting Governor for the
period of three months.”
After members unanimously adopted the
report, the House directed the President of the Customary Court of
Appeal to swear in the Speaker as an acting governor, since the state
has no substantive or acting CJ.
Don’t misuse power,Atiku tells PDP
A former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar,
on Tuesday warned the PDP-led Federal Government against what he
described as ‘‘excessive use of power’’, which Atiku said was not good
for decent democratic practice.
The ex-VP, who was reacting to the
impeachment of Nyako, said in a statement issued by his media office in
Abuja that wielding the axe of impeachment against elected public office
holders in order to settle scores by the Federal Government would
needlessly build up tension in the country.
The former Vice-President said, “The
reckless use of impeachment to settle scores could not have been the
intention of the framers of the 1999 Constitution. The frequency with
which elective officials were being shot down by impeachment would
destroy the whole purpose of inserting the impeachment clause in the
Constitution.
“The use of impeachment to harass and
humiliate perceived opponents by the PDP-led Federal Government would
ultimately bastardise the spirit in which the constitution provides for
the impeachment clause.”
He admonished the Federal Government to
take it easy in the way they use power, adding that “the constitution
was not meant to provide ammo for anybody to harass and humiliate
opponents or force them out of office.”
He also criticised the use of financial inducements to influence the removal of perceived opponents from office.
‘Nyako ouster unfortunate’
Ex-Governor of Kwara State, who is also a
leader of the APC, Senator Bukola Saraki, described the impeachment of
Nyako as unfortunate.
Saraki also raised the alarm that four other governors were already on the firing line.
He said, “It is very unfortunate and I
think we are seven months to the end of the tenure. We all need to look
at the bigger picture, look at the stability of our democracy. After
Adamawa, I think Nasarawa State governor is being served with
impeachment notice and three other states are going to be served.
“The bigger issue in this country now is
the issue of security and poverty. Some of the issues raised against
the Adamawa State governor can also apply anywhere and we need to be
mature with our democracy.
“The issue of impeachment should not be
our priority at this stage and those of us that love this country will
really need to talk to ourselves and be more concerned about challenges
before us instead of dissipating our energy on issues that will divide
us by overheating the polity and creating problems for ourselves.
“We should talk about how to improve
security and ensure better living conditions of our people. Those who
are beating the drums now should know that it will come back to them.”
Lawyers on impeachment
Some lawyers on Tuesday criticised the removal of Nyako, arguing that the process of his removal did not comply with the law.
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Emeka Ngige, asked the impeached governor to challenge his removal in court.
The lawyer, who expressed confidence
that the removal of the governor would be nullified in court, criticised
the failure of the investigative panel to ensure that the notice of
impeachment was personally served on the governor.
He said, “I believe that the process
will be nullified in court, it is only a matter of time. Ladoja suffered
the same thing in Oyo State. A similar thing happened in Anambra. They
went to a hotel to impeach Ladoja.
“You cannot serve impeachment notice on
somebody through substituted means. That was part of the reasons
Ladoja’s impeachment was set aside.”
He also expressed concern over the
implication of calling on the military to provide protection for the
Acting Chief Judge while setting up the panel.
He said, “It is part of the danger of
our militarised democracy. This will not do this country any good. A
situation where a Chief Judge is surrounded by soldiers with a view to
setting up a panel leaves much to be desired.
“I don’t think that is what the drafters
of our constitution had in mind when they created various arms of
government to handle impeachment.
“When you bring in the soldiers to now meddle in the process, then you are polluting the entire exercise.”
Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) said he would not
want to comment on the process as he was already in court challenging
the impeachment notice served on Nyako.
Another SAN, Mr. Yusuf Alli, who said he
had not followed the process leading to the impeachment of the
governor, said “we already saw it coming.”
Chief Felix Fagbohungbe, however, said
the impeachment of the governor was a demonstration of the PDP’s move to
take over states being governed by the APC.
He said reversing the impeachment in court would be a herculean task even if the process had been manipulated.
Fagbohungbe said, “Ordinarily, the
procedure would have been followed, but whether the intention was proper
is another thing because it has political undertone. It is the PDP that
is at work.
“The PDP wants to take over the states
controlled by the APC and the more they try to take over the APC states,
the better chance the PDP has to win the presidential election.
“They would follow the procedure, even
when they follow it, they would manipulate it by making sure that they
get the right person, who will do their bid to take over. It is a pity
that it will create more problems that Nigerians would want to see.
“Even if you go to court. Any court procedure to reverse it will be a herculean task.”
Chairman, Civil Society Network against Corruption, Mr. Lanre Suraj, also condemned the impeachment of the governor.
He encouraged Nyako to challenge his
removal in court, arguing that the failure to personally serve the
governor with the impeachment notice had rendered the whole process a
nullity.
He also faulted the intention of the
PDP-dominated Adamawa State House of Assembly to impeach the governor as
the allegations levelled against Nyako could be said to have been
committed while he was still in the PDP.
Suraj said, “Even if the parliament has
the constitutional power to impeach a governor when there are
infractions in his actions, the process that has just been employed is
not too clean and clear enough.
“There is a process the impeachment
notice is supposed to be served on the governor. The question you will
ask yourself is, would Nyako have been impeached if he was still in the
PDP? All the allegations he was accused of were activities he carried
out when he was under the PDP.
“I encourage Nyako to go to court and if our judiciary is truly independent, the process of his impeachment will be nullified.”
But Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN) expressed a
contrary opinion, arguing that the procedure for impeachment as set out
in the Constitution was substantially complied with.
He said the failure of the removed
governor to appear before the investigative panel amounted to an
admittance of the charges levelled against him.
Nwobike said, “I think the procedure of impeachment set out in the constitution was substantially complied with.
“The problem was that the former
governor refused to appear before the panel and it means that if you
refused to appear before the panel, all the allegations of misconduct
levelled against him were proved.
“It means there was no contrary evidence
against the allegations. So the panel was right to have given a guilty
verdict against the former governor.”
No comments:
Post a Comment