
Deola Kayode
By
the time 2014 will be over, #BringBackOurGirls will no doubt become the
hashtag of the year 2014. Last year, it was the hashtag and video
documentary of #Kony2012 which was developed to draw the attention of
the world to the war crimes committed by Joseph Kony, the Ugandan war
leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army.
In fact, the video garnered over 100
million views in less than a month. However, the #BringBackOurGirls
campaign has been nothing short of tremendous. It is not a documentary
awareness campaign. It is to bring the vile abduction of about 250
girls in Chibok, Borno State, into the fore-front of global
discussions.
With international media like CNN,
Al’Jazeera, The Economist, New York Times all weighing in on this issue,
the attention of the whole world has put the Presidency, the Nigerian
military and our politicians in the dock of public opinion. In my iPunch
article on Youth Slacktivism on April 15, I had noted that for
slacktivism to work – especially when it comes to the Nigerian polity –
the streets had to be an essential component of our tweets.
To the uninitiated, slacktivism is a
combined word from slacker and activism. It was coined to deride those
who offer online support to causes in order to feel sane or at least
assuage their feelings for or against a certain cause without actually
doing something constructive about it. Examples of “slacktivism” include
likes, tweeting and re-tweets for a cause, signing online petitions,
change of profile pictures, articles and pictures. As against normal
efforts, online slacktivism drove this campaign from the tweets into the
streets.
It has captured the attention of
religious leaders like the Pope Francis and even Sheikh Abdulaziz Al
al-Sheikh, a top religious authority in the birthplace of Islam, Saudi
Arabia, praying and condemning the actions of the insurgents. Political
leaders such as President Barack Obama and David Cameron are weighing in
by promising tactical military and logistic support. Entertainment
celebrities are not left out, making it already look like a ‘feel among’
roll call of some sort.
They include P. Diddy, The Rock, Usher,
Genevieve Nnaji, Tiwa Savage, Tonto Dikeh, Angelina Jolie, Kim
Kardashia, Seun Kuti, Anne Hathaway, Michelle Obama, Ellen DeGeneres,
Christiane Amanpour. Like every success having many relatives, it is
already gathering controversies as people leverage the hashtag to garner
support for their own funding or personal reputation. It is therefore
important that we ensure the focus of the online and offline campaign
are not lost in a maze of the cacophony of memes, jokes, fun and viral
media content that accompany any successful campaign – these girls must
be found, rescued and alive.
Focus on the ball, not the scoreboard
Can tweets, likes, posts and selfies
serve as a catalyst for social change? It already is. Critics of online
campaigns will also tell you there is a high tendency to shift focus
from the important issues of the campaign into the minor issues which
serve as a distraction to the entire process. The aim of the hashtags,
tweets and picture memes is not to bring the girls back, but it is aimed
at ensuring that we generate enough buzz that it will not be ignored.
We should therefore not get lost in the maze of buzz to the detriment of
not only the children, but also to everyone of us who is in danger if
something constructive is not done urgently.
Football matches are not won by focusing
on the score board, it is won by focusing on the ball and the post. It
is not just about how many people took pictures, tweeted and it is the
rescuing of those girls and the quest for good governance. It is the
quest that the primary purpose of governance is the security and welfare
of the citizens. The ultimate goal is not even to get the international
media to remind the Federal Government of its duties and
responsibilities, it is to remind the citizens that the sovereign power
to elect their leaders rests with them. It is also to remind them that
they also have the power to press the ‘undo’ button when certain
decisions and policies are not favourable to them.
The vicious activities of Boko Haram did
not start today. It has caused serious pain and loss of lives and
properties, leaving in its trail the devastation of a section of the
nation, while threatening to spread to the rest of us. The countless
number of villages burnt, people killed including the previous
devastation of some students in Yobe State. It however the mindless act
of the kidnapping of the school girls that stirred the conscience of
the world.
Have Nigerians changed?
Critics of online activism say it does a
lot more on noise than power. After the hue and cry over the #KONY2012
campaign, Joseph Kony is still at large. Just as citizens moved out
massively during the #OccupyNigeria protest , it was easily quelled by a
balance of the military’s ‘show of force’ and the alleged compromise of
the labour leaders. The question, however, remains: has ciitizen
mobilisation changed in Nigeria?
The fact remains that it took the
international heavy weights to intervene before our government saw the
need to be accountable to Nigerians on the progress and activities taken
to ensure that there is peace in the North. Though there are offers of
foreign support for our soldiers from USA, China, Britain, Canada,
France and Israel, the future of Nigeria still rests with us the
citizens.
Long after these hashtags cease to trend,
will we still pay attention to government’s efforts, policies and
programmes? Will Nigerians maintain eternal vigilance when the next
trending issue attempts to overtakes this one? Will we leave politics
and governance to politicians , which is an issue that brought us here?
As the #OccupyNigeria and #BringBackOurGirls protest have all shown, if
our tweets will make any difference at all, it must reach the streets,
it must create avenues to effect changes.
No comments:
Post a Comment