
Femi Falana
Human
rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), has asked President Goodluck
Jonathan to stop people from further trivialising the abduction of over
200 schoolgirls from Government Secondary School, Chibok, Borno State on
April 14.
The Lagos lawyer in a statement on
Thursday said the comment credited to “some people”, including the
President’s wife, Patience, that “no child was missing”, was
“incendiary” and capable of deepening the agony of the abducted
children’s parents.
“President Goodluck Jonathan should
ensure that the abduction of the innocent girls is not further
trivialised in the interest of our collective sensibility and public
morality,” he stated.
He described as insensitive for some
highly placed persons to insist that there was no missing child despite
the step by the Christian Association of Nigeria to publish some the
abducted girls’ names.
He said, “In spite of the inauguration of
the Presidential Committee to investigate the abduction of the over 200
girls and the publication of the names of about 185 of the missing
girls by the CAN some political leaders have insisted that no child has
been abducted.
“Such level of insensitivity is being
displayed by highly placed persons at a time that the Boko Haram leader,
Abubakar Shekau, has admitted that the criminal sect abducted the
innocent girls and threatened that they would be sold into slavery.”
He queried the basis for the government’s
acceptance of international aid to rescue the children if truly the
girls were not missing.
His statement also read, “Why has the
Federal Government accepted the offer of the United States’ Government
to join in the frivolous -search for the girls since they are no longer
missing?
“No doubt, the incendiary statements
credited to certain people to the effect that “no child is missing” must
have accentuated the agony of the parents of the abducted girls some of
whom had taken part in street demonstrations title ‘Bring Back Our
Girls’.”
He asked the President to disband the
committee set up by Patience to investigate the incident, arguing that
she had no power to do so.
He added that even the one set up by the
President himself for the same purpose could best serve as a
“ministerial act” and never as a Commission of Inquiry.
Falana urged that the Supreme Court had
held in its judgment “in Fawehinmi v. Babangida (2003) 3 NWLR (PT 808)
604 that the power of the President to set up a Commission of Inquiry is
limited to the Federal Capital Territory by virtue of the Tribunal of
Inquiry Act (CAP T21 ) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.”
He said, “Therefore, the committee set up
by the President and inaugurated on Tuesday, May 6, 2014 to probe the
abduction of the girls is best a ministerial act. But the First Lady has
no power whatsoever to institute a panel to investigate any matter in
any part of Nigeria.
“To that extent, the panel
of inquiry alleged to have been set up by the First Lady is illegal,
unconstitutional, null and void. It should be disbanded without any
further delay.”
No comments:
Post a Comment