
Nigeria
has forced a shift in the attention of the global media from the
disappeared Malaysian Airways flight MH370. Events in Nigeria in the
past several weeks are unprecedented but not unpredictable. Boko Haram
has progressively capitalised on the ineptitude of the Nigerian
government, emboldened to “success” by the failure of the state
apparatus on several fronts. Recently, through successive car bombs on
soft targets that have yielded monumental casualties and the successive
kidnap of more than 200 schoolgirls from both their hostels and
families, the sect has aroused international anger. It has called
international attention to Nigeria, a country of contradictions and
complexities, wherein the more you look, the less you see.
Nigerians and all people of goodwill are
united in not only demanding the release of the abducted schoolgirls,
but also for an end to terrorism that is festering in that country and,
by extension, in the Western and Central African regions. The brazen
nocturnal abduction of the Chibok schoolgirls in Nigeria’s North-East
zone has the potential to be both the tipping and turning points for
Boko Haram and the Nigerian state. We should seize this moment for good.
Already, the social media has been co-opted to fire the campaigns,
thanks to Ms. Ramaa Mosley of Los Angeles. Mosley heard and took up the
plea of Nigerian mothers: “BringBackOurGirls”. Facebook, the Twitter verse,
celebrities of all shades, and civil society activists have now pushed
the reluctant Obama administration and segments of American political
leadership to join in. The same is true of Canada and the rest of Africa
and the democratic world. Nigerians at home and in the Diaspora have
found a sense of partnership globally. Before now, all the atrocities
targeted against Nigerians by Boko Haram seem to have gone unnoticed in
the eyes of the international community. Nigerians felt lonely and left
alone. The Western media have woken up from their slumber or convenient
blackout of the Nigerian crisis. The spotlight seems to have now turned
on Nigeria and inexorably on its failed political elite and the cesspool
of corruption under which they habitually wallow. Nigeria is now bared
naked before the whole world. Knowledgeable, ignorant and pretentious
experts on Nigeria are all competing for space in the media with genuine
and questionable statistics and information about the country. So be
it. It is a welcome opportunity to interrogate “Nigeria” and to hold its
leadership to account across the globe.
But what took so long before everyone
weighed in? The Nigerian leadership and the international community have
equal blame in keeping the Nigerian crisis out of the radar. Nigeria
has created and sustained the illusion and delusion that it has the Boko
Haram menace under control. In the characteristic arrogance of its
political leadership, the “giant of Africa” is equal to the task. After
all, it has the strongest military power in the West African region and
has been a stabilising military power on the continent. Did President
Goodluck Jonathan not promise to assist Kenya following the WestGate
Mall massacres in Nairobi recently? Nigeria has long pretended that it
does not need outside help. If it did, it did not seem to approach the
needed help with deserving seriousness. How one wishes that it truly
needed no help. But terrorism is not like conventional warfare. It is
not the exclusive internal affair of any country, not even the strongest
country on earth, let alone for one incapable of policing its borders.
Perhaps, Nigeria is afraid that with outside help comes close scrutiny
in regard to accountability for resources deployed, even those claimed
to have been deployed in fighting terrorism. Accountability is a
department in which the Nigerian governments at all levels perform most
woefully.
Consistent with the arrogance and ostrich
mentality of Nigeria’s political class, one of the country’s political
actors at the Presidency was recently playing to tune. Making a
highfaluting claim to CNN’s Aisha Sessay, a presidential aide,
Dr. Doyin Okupe, enthused that Nigeria has the manpower, resources and
what it takes to deal with the situation on the ground. He ended the
encounter by pleading with the world to give his government “sometime”!
Not any more, the parents cannot wait; the people are tired of excuses;
the world is running out of patience. The presidential official needed
to have wondered where in the world could such large number of
casualties and victims be recorded in quick succession without
consequences. How many more people would have to die, how many more
girls would have to be abducted while Nigeria is given sometime?
Nigeria is not prepared but it has no
choice but to embrace the consequences of a global outrage and the
scrutiny it entails. The Nigerian government had claimed that shortly
after their abduction, its security forces rescued a large number of the
girls. But it retracted the claim when it did not add up. With the
continued global scrutiny, more details are coming out, for example,
regarding the timeline of the abductions and with critical information
that unmistakably put the government on the defensive. Clearly, these
accounts point to the bungling of the prevailing crisis. Meanwhile, the
government has constituted a panel on the Chibok schoolgirls abduction –
another bureaucracy in the line of much needed result. Many Nigerians
believe that their governments at all levels have failed them. Whether
they are right or wrong is a matter of the evidence on the ground.
Everywhere one looks, that evidence is incontrovertible in support of
the prevailing sentiment.
In their anger and outrage, Nigerians are
demonstrating both against Boko Haram and their governments. Gradually,
they are tapping, with the rest of the world, onto the power of the
social media. Nigerian government ought to sit up and read the
handwriting on the wall. No government should underrate the power of the
social media, especially as it relates to a people that are
increasingly resentful of their political leadership. One is sick and
tired of the worn-out refrain of not politicising national security on
account of terrorism. The truth is that only a few things are
apolitical. The rise of Boko Haram is an integral part of both Nigeria’s
political fragility and its political metamorphosis. Weighing
government’s response or failure of response, or even lack of effective
response to Boko Haram is essentially a political exercise before it was
a security one. What else can it be? Politics is like air; it is
everywhere even when we do not see it. Those who want to conveniently
take many things out of the political realm are often quick to take
political credit over the stuff they seek to exclude. Assuming that the
Boko Haram crisis has been decisively resolved, one wonders if the
ruling party would not gloat about that in its imminent campaign trail.
In seven months, Nigerians would head for
the polls in another general election. At the moment, Nigeria is
conducting a National Conference from constitutional sidelines with a
view to a collective reflection on its political future. Deliberations
from the conference point to a country in which its constituent
nationalities have a strong appetite to renegotiate the basis of their
political engagement from all the important fundamentals. That
sentiment assumed unusual urgency since the return of democracy in
Nigeria in 1999 and subsequent introduction of what ex-president
Olusegun Obasanjo called “political Sharia” law in parts of Northern
Nigeria. A combination of interrelated factors including corruption,
chronic poverty, wealth and educational gap, religious fundamentalism,
ethnic distrust, struggle for resource control, youth restiveness and
unemployment remain combustible threats to Nigeria’s existence. Not too
long ago, tens of unemployed youths were choked to death as hundreds of
thousands struggled for employment opportunity open to only a few
hundreds under a bungled public recruitment exercise. The plight of the
Chibok abducted schoolgirls and others and the victims of the recent
Nyanya double car bombings in the Abuja suburb are enough to transform
the #BringBackOurGirls to #BringBackOurCountry! But not the old country.
• Oguamanam, a Law professor, University of Ottawa, Canada, wrote in via @chidi_oguamanam
No comments:
Post a Comment